Penultimate round punishment in the LOCL

By Hendon LOCL captain Andrew Medworth
Wednesday 3 February, 2021

Both Hendon teams lost in the LOCL this evening. Hendon A were outclassed by a very strong Battersea A team, while Hendon B barely lost a very winnable-looking match against Metropolitan.

Hendon A Hendon A Battersea A Battersea A
1
Rob Willmoth
2200 0 - 1
Adam Bukojemski
2380
2
Alex Leslie
2088 0 - 1
Tim P. Wall
2260
3
Jason Covey
1990 0 - 1
Luca Buanne
2005
4
David Amior
1900 0 - 1
Denis Dupuis
1870
0 - 4

In the Open Division, Board 4 was the first to finish. David Amior had repeated the line of the Scandinavian he played against me in the final round of the Club Championship. A position with castling on opposite sides arose, but David closed the queenside (where he was attacking) with …b4, while his opponent opened the g-file against David’s king. David’s opponent’s attack was consequently much stronger, and it duly won him the game.

Once again, we had two junior players, Alex and Jason, playing on the middle two boards. Previously this has been a recipe for great success, but this week they got into trouble.

Jason had a promising kingside attack, playing an excellent rook sacrifice to open the h-file. But he followed this with an incorrect knight sacrifice on g6, and his opponent defended. Jason managed to obtain some counterplay against Black’s exposed king, and might have saved the game with a difficult chance at the end, but ultimately his opponent was able to consolidate his extra material.

Meanwhile, Alex suffered a kingside attack after his opponent played a strong rook lift via d3. He wasn’t able to obtain enough queenside counterplay and was blown away in the early middlegame.

With the match already lost, our hope of taking any game points rested with Rob on Board 1. Unfortunately, however, he had gone badly wrong in the opening, was unable to complete his development, and was cut to shreds by his opponent’s bishop pair.

I have annotated three out of the four games in this match, as I think they were very interesting and instructive.

Wall,Tim - Leslie,Alex
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
1.e41,180,95054%2421---
1.d4956,91055%2434---
1.Nf3285,50956%2441---
1.c4184,27056%2442---
1.g319,85756%2427---
1.b314,56954%2428---
1.f45,94648%2377---
1.Nc33,89750%2383---
1.b41,78848%2379---
1.a31,24754%2406---
1.e31,08049%2409---
1.d396550%2378---
1.g467046%2361---
1.h446554%2381---
1.c343851%2425---
1.h328956%2420---
1.a411860%2461---
1.f310047%2427---
1.Nh39267%2511---
1.Na34762%2476---
Wall,T1–0Leslie,A
FMLondon Online Chess League - Open2021
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.Bb5+ Bd7 4.Bxd7+ Qxd7 5.0-0 Nf6 6.Qe2 Nc6 7.Rd1 g6 8.c3 Bg7 9.d4 cxd4 10.cxd4 d5 11.e5 Ne4 12.Ne1 h6 13.Nc3 Nxc3 14.bxc3 0-0 An interesting middlegame position. The White c3 pawn is potentially weak, and Black has better development, but lifting the rook to the kingside with Rd3 is a dangerous idea, and Black must play carefully. 15.Nd3 b6 16.Nf4 e6 17.Rd3 Rac8 18.Bd2 Na5 This is where things start to go wrong for Alex. Sinking the knight into c4 is optically nice, but White's kingside attack is very dangerous, and the knight should have been kept nearer the king. 18...Ne7 19.Rg3 Qa4! gives Black good counterplay - the idea in the game is completely covered by the Ne7. 20.Nh5? gxh5 21.Bxh6 Nf5!-+ The attack is brutally repelled by the beautifully placed knight. 18...b5 is a sharp counterplay attempt suggested by Stockfish 19.Rg3 b4! is the idea when 20.Nh5 is met by bxc3! 21.Bxh6! 21.Be3? Qd8 21...Nxd4! 21...Bxh6? 22.Nf6+ Kg7 23.Nxd7 Nxd4 24.Qg4 c2 25.h3 c1Q+ 26.Rxc1 Rxc1+ 27.Kh2 Rd8 28.Qxd4 Rxd7± 22.Qd3! Bxe5! 23.f4! Bh8 24.Rxg6+! fxg6 25.Qxg6+ Bg7 26.Bxg7! Ne2+! 27.Kh1 Nxf4! 28.Qh6! c2! 29.Rc1 e5! 30.Bxf8 Nxh5 31.Qxh5 Rxf8 32.Qxe5 d4 33.Qg5+ Qg7 34.Qd5+ Kh8 35.Qh5+ Qh7 36.Qe5+= A completely outrageous computer line, but as regular readers will know by now, I have an unhealthy fascination with such things! 19.Rg3 Nc4 20.Bc1 Rc7 Now White gets to show his idea to good effect. 21.Nh5! Qe7 21...gxh5 22.Bxh6 f6 23.exf6 Rxf6 24.Bxg7 Qxg7 25.Qxh5+- 22.Qf3 Qh4 This doesn't work, but Black was already devoid of good options. 22...Rfc8 23.Nf6+ Kf8 24.Rh3 h5 25.g4 hxg4 26.Nxg4 Na5 is another possible continuation, when I simply had to show: 27.Qf6‼ Cute! :) Bxf6 28.exf6 Qxf6 29.Nxf6+- 23.Nxg7 Kxg7 24.Rh3 Qe4 24...Qe7 25.Bxh6+ Kg8 26.Qf6 Qxf6 27.exf6 was no better, with Bg7 and Rh8# to follow 25.Bxh6+ Kg8 26.Qf6 A nice attacking game by White. 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBRes
Wall,T-Leslie,A-1–0
Covey,J1680Buanne,L-0–1
Dupuis,D-Amior,D16121–0
MetroGnomes MetroGnomes Hendon B Hendon B
1
Henry Armburg-Jennings
1795 1 - 0
Chris Rogal
1803
2
Nicholas Nardecchia
1465 ½ - ½
Anthony Kent
1750
3
Mark Nevison
1443 1 - 0
David Lewis
1465
4
Joshua Beckmann
1390 0 - 1
Stanley Jacobs
1390
2½ - 1½

I had high hopes of a good result in the B team match, since we had equal or higher grades than our opponents on all boards. However, it began inauspiciously when David Lewis resigned after 14 moves, having lost his queen to an opening blunder. Sadly, he’d had a great position, spurning a couple of opportunities to trap his opponent’s bishop with g2-g4.

(We were assigned the wrong colours for this match, getting White on the odd boards when we should have had it on the even ones. Unfortunately I didn’t notice this in time to fix it before the round started. Whether it made any difference to the outcome, who can say!)

Stanley then levelled the scores, scoring our only full point of the round, having been better for most of the game. However, Chris lost on Board 1, after allowing his opponent to gain a space advantage on the queenside; he then offered a queen trade at a tactically inopportune moment, leaving him with a lost ending.

Therefore we needed Anthony to win in order to tie the match, on the board where we had the biggest grading advantage over our opponents. He had obtained a very promising minor piece ending, but with both players low on time, he rejected the opportunity to exchange his knight for his opponent’s bishop (which would have resulted in a very promising bishop-versus-knight situation), instead trading it for a knight, leaving a very drawish opposite-coloured bishop ending. This was duly drawn, resulting in a match defeat.

Many thanks to all who played! The final round of this LOCL season is next Tuesday, with the next season starting in early March. More to come on that soon.

You can find a list of all stories about the London Online Chess League here.