Hendon 2 win at Harrow!

By Andrew Medworth, Hendon Club Captain
Saturday 15 November, 2025

Last Thursday, Hendon 2 scored a fine 4–2 win away against Harrow 1. Read on for a full report, including an interactive replay of Elliott Macneil’s excellent draw on top board against junior sensation WIM Bodhana Sivanandan!

Harrow 1 are an enigmatic side, having been promoted to Division 1 and then demoted back to Division 2 again in successive seasons.

They have several strong regulars, including Nevil Chan, Jagdeep Dhemrait, and now 10-year-old Bodhana Sivanandan, who continues to make the news as she became the youngest female player ever to defeat a Grandmaster at the 2025 British Championship and gained the WIM title. However, they often seem to field quite low-rated players on lower boards, even at home.

In some ways, this was our opponents’ first “proper” match of the season: they had beaten Hammersmith 2 at home, but only with the help of two defaults, and they had then bizarrely lost 4½–1½ to the Harrow second team. So it was anyone’s guess what sort of team we would face this evening.

In the end, they fielded a characteristically lop-sided line-up, with WIM Sivanandan (rated 2284) on top board, followed by three players in the 1900s, and then two players in the 1400s on Boards 5 and 6 – a rating difference of almost 900 points between the top and bottom boards (as opposed to a much more normal 255 points for us)!

However, this left the match in an unusual kind of balance, as we out-rated our opponents heavily on the bottom two boards and slightly on Board 2, while they out-rated us significantly on the other three boards. Amazingly, the average ratings of the two teams differed by just 19 points (in our favour).

The match started well for us, as Vasileios won next to me on Board 5, and our own junior representative Aviraj overcame the rating disadvantage to defeat Nevil Chan on Board 3. Frustratingly, I only managed to draw my own game on bottom board, despite having a significantly better position throughout.

On Board 4, Harrow captain Jagdeep Dhemrait had a significant advantage, which he duly converted. However, Jonathan was material ahead on Board 2, and if he won, we would be assured of victory, whatever happened on top board.

That Board 2 game was a roller-coaster: Jonathan was a piece up, which he traded for a three-pawn advantage, but to my horror, over the next few moves he lost a couple of pawns, eventually ending up in a double rook ending with two pawns against one (g+h versus h) which I was almost sure should be drawn with best play. However, in the time scramble Jonathan’s opponent blundered his pawn, and Jonathan marched his duo to victory!

While the Board 1 clash was ultimately irrelevant to the match result, any game involving Harrow’s wunderkind always attracts an audience! However, Elliott wasn’t intimidated by his opponent’s reputation, and played a really excellent game, equalising out of the opening and tempting WIM Sivanandan into sinking her knight into a hole on f5; unfortunately for her, the piece proved a liability rather than an asset, and was eventually traded off, Elliott winning a pawn in the process.

For the remainder of the game, Elliott was comfortably better, and the repetition of moves at the end was more a function of mutual time pressure than a complete dissipation of Black’s advantage. For the full game, annotated by Elliott, please see below.

Congratulations to Elliott on this excellent result! Hold on to that scoresheet, as it may be a collector’s item one day if this remarkable young lady continues to make strides in the game at her current pace!

Harrow 1 Harrow 1 Hendon 2 Hendon 2
1
Sivanandan, Bodhana
2284 ½ - ½
Macneil, Elliott CM
1995
2
Sharp, Thomas M
1928 0 - 1
Rubeck, Jonathan
1993
3
Chan, Nevil
1974 0 - 1
Bhaduri, Aviraj
1800
4
Dhemrait, Jagdeep
1942 1 - 0
Ben-Nathan, David
1773
5
McKenna, Phil
1410 0 - 1
Kollias, Vasileios
1750
6
Sartain, Patrick P
1401 ½ - ½
Medworth, Andrew
1740
2 - 4

Many thanks to all the players for turning out and achieving this excellent result!

Chess Game Viewer

This page contains an interactive chess game viewer. To view it, we need to load external resources from ChessBase.

[Event "Middlesex League Div 2 (Harrow 1 vs Hendon 2)"] [Site "Harrow High School"] [Date "2025.11.13"] [Round "?"] [White "WIM Bodhana Sivanandan"] [Black "Elliott Macneil"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [EventDate "2025.11.13"] [ECO "B07"] [PlyCount "86"] [Board "1/6"] [Opening "Pirc Defense: 150 Attack"] 1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.Be3 c6 5.Qd2 {The scary "150 attack". White's plan is to trade the dark squared bishops with Bh6 at some point, and play f3, g4, h4 - assuming I castle kingside! White often castles queenside as a result - which motivates the following response...} 5...b5 6.f3 {Following up on the plan. The good news for me is that e5 is never really a concern , since the knight is not occupying the f3 square.} 6...Qc7 7.a3 a6 {Maybe a bit too cautious, but I feel more comfortable when the queenside is secured like so, just in case I want to castle long.} 8.Bd3 e5 9.Nge2 Nbd7 10.O-O {Since White has castled kingside, it no longer makes sense to follow the plan of attack as described above. It is now safe for black to castle kingside.} 10...Bg7 ( 10...exd4 {Initially I thought I could try} 11.Bxd4 c5 $2 {with the idea being c4 later to trap the bishop on d3} 12.Nd5 $1 {however this move refutes it immediately. I should complete my development.} ) 11.dxe5 dxe5 ( 11...Nxe5 {is also possible, but I prefer to have control over d4 and f4 - both to stop Nd4 being a possibility, but also to stop this f4 type of attack} ) 12.Bh6 O-O 13.Ng3 Nc5 14.Bxg7 Kxg7 15.Rad1 ( 15.Qg5 h6 {White has no attack} ) 15...Ne6 16.Nce2 {I think the point of this is to prepare f4} 16...Bb7 $5 17.Kh1 {Pre-empting Qb6 and Ng4 ideas, further hinting at f4 soon} 17...Rad8 {Trying to put pressure on this bishop, which looks a little silly} 18.Qe3 h5 {The knight on g3 is running short on squares} 19.Kg1 Rd7 20.h3 {This seems to stop my future plan of playing Ng4 when f4 comes, so now I feel my response is forced} 20...h4 {We are both down to around twenty minutes.} 21.Nh1 Nh5 {Clamping down on f4} 22.Nf2 Rfd8 23.Ng4 Nhf4 $2 {A bit too eager to trade pieces. White has a bit less space, and the pieces keep tripping over one another, so trades help them.} ( 23...g5 {is a bit better perhaps} ) 24.Nxf4 Nxf4 25.Qf2 g5 26.Ne3 c5 27.Nf5+ $2 {The computer dislikes this move, but I didn't realise why during the game. The knight looks nice, but it doesn't have any pieces to help, nor many squares to move to.} ( 27.Rfe1 c4 28.Bf1 {is an improvement} ) 27...Kg6 ( 27...Kf6 28.Nxh4 gxh4 29.Qxh4+ {I was worried about this sort of attack, but this might be misguided} ) 28.Qe3 c4 29.Be2 Rxd1 30.Bxd1 ( 30.Rxd1 Rxd1+ 31.Bxd1 {is a similar outcome. White's bishop is bad, and black's bishop will swiftly be traded for the good knight on f5. White cannot touch black's good knight.} ) 30...Bc8 {We are both just dipping below ten minutes.} 31.c3 Bxf5 $5 32.exf5+ Kxf5 $6 {The computer has a lot more patience, and recommends holding off on this exchange until I gain some control with Rd3, Qd8 etc.} 33.Bc2+ Ke6 34.a4 f6 $2 ( {The computer prefers} 34...bxa4 {since} 35.Ra1 ( 35.Bxa4 Rd3 ) 35...f5 36.Rxa4 Rd6 {but I didn't see this at all.} ) 35.axb5 axb5 36.Ra1 Rd6 37.Qe4 Nd3 {At this point I was fairly confident I would hold the draw.} 38.Qg4+ Ke7 39.Ra8 Rd8 {I offered a draw...} 40.Ra6 Rd6 {We are both down to one minute.} 41.Ra8 Rd8 42.Ra6 Rd6 43.Ra8 Rd8 {and we agreed a draw. Overall, I'm happy with how I played. There were some mistakes related to maybe playing for a draw more than a win, due to the prestige of my opponent, but I'm happy I didn't make any huge blunders! I'm also happy that the team performed well today, winning the match!} 1/2-1/2